Update : 2019.06.07  Fri  No : 503
제목 본문 이름
The Argus Prize
The Argus Prize 2018 English Essay Contest

Last month, The Argus hosted the essay contest for HUFSans. Undergraduate students wrote 700-800 word essays choosing from one of the four topics: #MeToo movement, Fourth Industrial Revolution, University Education, and Campus Journalism. A great many students submitted their writings, showing their passion for English.

Two foreign HUFS professors helped score the entries in accordance with seven criteria which included the ability to communicate a consistent idea and develop it in a logical and an organized manner. The essays were also graded on whether they abide by the style requirement, or the document format.
The Argus announced three award-winners on May 21 via SNS channels such as Facebook and Instagram (@hufsargus). The first, second and third place essays are published in the following pages.

The Argus Evaluation

1st Place
The essay unfolds in a 1st person narrative style as in a memoir, carrying a personal voice and description. The writer talks about how she sees and feels about her experiences with university. Her story is intriguing, but lacks organization. It would have been more entertaining to read if there were evidence or explanation that provides an insight, rather than a share of her impression. In other words, it would have been better to contain some elements of an academic writing which centers around a debatable ? and thus interesting and enlightening - idea and provides supporting details in both organized and logical manner.

2nd Place
Her choice of title is well-played; it lures the readers to read more to find out the answer to a long-standing concern for humanities major undergraduates like HUFSans. It is unfortunate that the hook, or the starting sentence, do not compare. Nevertheless, the attempt to challenge the widespread fear of human-replaceable artificial intelligence. And the effective word choices help communicate her ideas very clearly. The mass of wonderful ideas would have perfected if it had been developed with more concrete explanations and sources.

3rd Place
The essay was written by someone who has an admirable taste for words and expressions. They are powerful enough to be more easily persuaded. However, it would have been better if she attempted to do more than share her affirmative stance toward the #MeToo movement. It would have been more interesting approach to tackle the controversies based on deep-rooted gender differences or anything other than what the public and the media all know and think.

2018.06.12  No : 495
How Was the Korean Spring S
The Perks of Being a Wallfl
Call Me by Your Name
Two Sides of High Intellige
Running a Marathon for Equa
Denuclearization: the Key t
HUFS Responds to Fourth Ind
The Perks of Being a Wallflower
HUFSan’s Voice
Two Sides of High Intelligence
Denuclearization: the Key to Peace of Mind
The Argus Swimming Below the Surface
Learning English Through Revision
# Rapport
A close and harmonious relationship in ...
A Cartoon
Watch Out for Poisoned Apples
HUFS Creates ‘HUFS x HUFS Alumni Mentoring’
HUFS Responds to Fourth Industrial Revolution
HUFS Introduces Innovative Convergence Major
Student Counseling Center Uses Fine Art to Counsel Students
Working Women Give Advice to HUFSans
HUFSans Prepare Spring Festival
HUFS Opens 8th Russian Discussion Contest
HUFS Recruits Prospective Software Specialists
New Library To Come to HUFS by 2020
Cover Story
How Was the Korean Spring Seen from the Outside?
The Argus Prize
The Argus Prize 2018 English Essay Contest
The Argus Prize
Finding My Ithaca
The Argus Prize
Why Young Humanities Majors Still Have Hope in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
The Argus Prize
#MeToo, Small Fingers Make a Big Change
Running a Marathon for Equality
News Briefing
Round Talk
We Study N·K at HUFS
Call Me by Your Name
Who Makes the Invisible Visible
Culture Trip
Feeling Store, a Journey to Face Ourselves